Family, Estates & Trusts 

FREE CONSULTATIONS

| ,

Minor Child Not Permitted to have Counsel to Advocate Against Disfavoured Parent


  • Blog
  • Alienation
  • Minor Child Not Permitted to have Counsel to Advocate Against Disfavoured Parent

The Court of Appeal, in J.E.S.D. v. Y.E.P.  2018 BCCA 286, found that a 17 year old child who had persistently refused any contact with her father was not entitled to her own lawyer to argue for her own desired outcome in a hearing in court about parenting time.  The panel found that the Family Law Act, which includes provisions to elicit a child’s views, were sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the Hague Convention on the Rights of Child.  The Convention, although not directly applicable to Canadian family law legislation, emphasizes that procedural safeguards will help protect the best interests of the child.  One such recommendation is for “appropriate legal representation”.

The Family Law Act (s. 203) does provide that a court can order that a child have their own lawyer as a full advocate, but only if the conflict between the parents is so severe that they cannot act in the best interest of the child. Further, it must be shown that counsel is required to protect those best interests.  The courts in B.C. have rarely found it necessary to appoint counsel for a child in the context of a private dispute between parents.  Here, the mother was impaired in her judgment about the child’s best interests while the father was not in a position to promote the child’s best interests because he had not been given an opportunity to do.  The estrangement between father and daughter prevented him from being an effective parent.   It would be for the trial judge to test the allegations of alienation and to determine an appropriate remedy.  This particular child had already spoken her mind through her own affidavits, affidavits of her mother, expert reports, and a judicial interview.

Noting that “inherent…is the recognition that circumstances will exist when the child’s wishes do not conform to what is in her or her best interests”, the court in this case found that it was contrary to the child’s interests to place her in an adversarial role against her father or court-appointed experts.  Here, the child’s wishes were one factor among many that would help a court make its determination.

In short, unless the government wishes to again fund child advocates as it did under the now- repealed Family Relations Act, children’s voices will continue to be heard in court through parents and experts, rather than through direct legal representation.

Have questions about a topic?

Onyx Law Group represents clients in family law, estate and trust litigation, estate planning and probate matters. Consult with our experienced team at 
(604) 900-2538

TELL US ABOUT YOUR CASE

(604) 900-2538

Call for a Free Consultation
  • We were made to feel valued and heard. Integrity, competence and a passion for justice definitely describes Onyx. They are also caring, compassionate and have a good sense of humour.

  • Thanks to Onyx’s straightforward approach, this litigation was resolved with the best outcome for myself and my children. Although this ordeal was emotionally trying, we can get on with our lives, without added worry and stress.

  • I chose the right law firm and I know our future is on the proper course because of Onyx. I wouldn’t hesitate to tell anyone who needs good legal representation to take my words to heart.

We will find the best way to help you

Vancouver

650 West Georgia Street
Suite 1215 - The Scotia Tower
Vancouver, BC  V6B 4N9

T (604) 900 2538
F (604) 900 2539

reception@onyxlaw.ca

New Westminster

26 Fourth Street
Suite 100
New Westminster, BC  V3L 5M4

T (604) 900 2538
F (604) 900 2539

reception@onyxlaw.ca

Kelowna

1631 Dickson Avenue
Suite 1100
Kelowna, BC  V1Y 0B5

T (604) 900-2538
F (604) 900-2539

reception@onyxlaw.ca